Best Friends Animal Society

Network Home CommunitiesThe Legal Animal News Denver kills dozens of friendly pit bulls, including puppies, despite offer to move them to a rescue out of state.
Welcome to The Legal Animal! The battle to improve animal welfare is moving increasingly into our courts and legislatures. The Legal Animal offers an inside look at this struggle, with up-to-date news on developments in animal law, and in-depth discussions of vital legal issues. We will also give you the tools to make the law work for animals in your area. Please join our community, explore our resources, and learn more about helping animals through law. More>
Prev53 of 126 stories Next
Print
The Legal Animal

Denver kills dozens of friendly pit bulls, including puppies, despite offer to move them to a rescue out of state.

July 22, 2006 : 12:00 AM
Taking its “pit bull ban” to the extreme, the city of Denver euthanized 36 pit bulls Thursday, including 13 puppies, despite a shelter volunteer’s offer to transport them out of state to a rescue.

The dogs were seized from owner Michael Padilla in May, and had been kept in cages at animal control since then awaiting their death – according to Padilla, in substandard conditions with inadequate care.

Last week, Padilla made a plea agreement with the city that kept him out of jail, but signed a death warrant for his dogs. Denver Animal Control euthanized the dogs Thursday after receiving a court order allowing it to do so.

Padilla was reportedly traveling through Denver when his dogs were seized. He said he was moving from Texas to a new home outside of Denver, but stopped in the city to pick up and move his ill mother.

However, the city says that this was Padilla’s second violation of the pit bull ban, and he was also cited for neglect and cruelty to animals. Padilla was convicted in 2002 for illegally having a pit bull in Denver, and at that time signed an affidavit agreeing that he would not bring pit bulls back into the city, and if he did, the animals would be euthanized.

Normally, the pit bull ordinance allows owners to prove that the animals will be transported out of the city, as an alternative to euthanasia. (See a copy of the city's ordinance in the resources section of this website.)

But in this case, apparently, Denver authorities thought that the proper punishment for Padilla's second transgression was to kill 36 dogs innocently caught in the middle.

The dogs killed Thursday were “quite sweet,” according to the Rocky Mountain News.

In fact, one volunteer who helped care for them for their months of confinement got so attached to the animals that she was willing to pay for them to be transported out of state so they could be saved.

Tami Bishop pleaded with the city to allow her to move the dogs out of state to a pit bull rescue in Montana, even contacting the mayor, but with no success. Before Padilla’s sudden plea agreement, Bishop thought she had until August 7, when a hearing was set to decide the future of the dogs.

But the city didn’t waste any time in killing the dogs as soon as it got the legal authority, even as Bishop was out of town and unable to intervene.

Read more about this story from the Rocky Mountain News.

Outraged by Denver's decision to kill these dogs, rather than allow them to go to a rescue out of state?

Then contact Denver Mayor John W. Hickenlooper, and respectfully ask him: Why is Denver so intent on killing pit bull puppies, that it won't even allow them to move to a rescue outside the city? What city purpose does this action serve? How, exactly, does it help protect the Denver public from vicious dogs? Why did they ignore the plea from their volunteer to allow her to save these "sweet" dogs?

Mayor Hickenlooper may be reached at:

Mayor John W. Hickenlooper
Denver City and County Building
1437 Bannock Street, Suite 350
Denver, CO 80202

Phone: 720-865-9000
Fax: 720-865-8787
E-mail: MileHighMayor@ci.denver.co.us

When you call, fax, or write, let us know what the mayor's office has to say, by posting in the comments below!


Sign in to post a comment
Comments
  
September 26, 2006 at 10:49 PM
posted by: RuizV2
I really thinkk that the one punished should be the owner and not those innocent animals that where given the right to live I believe that this is not the way to fix things I think that that is cruel and that what they did is unremarakbly unfair and that they should look at the numbers and not the dogs. This just gets me so mad.
  
August 8, 2006 at 5:07 PM
posted by: Serretta
I have sent an e-mail to all the Districts & to the Mayor last week. As of today, I have not received an answer.
This is what I wrote them:
This is outragous!!!!
Evidently, none of you own Dogs, or any other kind of animal. Otherwise you wouldn't have these laws in the first place!!! It takes heartless people to make laws to ban a breed, just because of how their owners have brought them up.
Punish the people!!! Not the Dogs!!! It's not their faults!!!
  
July 28, 2006 at 9:27 AM
posted by: cattees
WOW - amazing tribute! I'm sitting here crying, shaking my head - and seething with anger. Isn't it bad enough that the City of Denver killed these poor creatures? Why did they have to TORTURE them first??? The pics from the beginning to the end show the evidence of their cruelty. It's absolutely disgusting - not to mention criminal!
  
July 27, 2006 at 9:35 PM
posted by: isabellasmom
Video tribute to the Denver 38...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1PR7hZCfxU
  
July 27, 2006 at 7:33 PM
posted by: jsweeney
There is no place in Heaven for people like you.
Shame, Shame, Shame on you.
  
July 26, 2006 at 11:59 PM
posted by: cathyg
I sent this exact same letter to all the council members as well as the mayor. I am looking forward to seeing what I get for replys. Will keep you posted.
*******************************************

Insurance companies, Home Owners Associations, and even entire cities and townships have jumped on the "Breed Banning Bandwagon". Pit Bulls, Rottwielers, Chows ... all have a substantial black mark on their reputation these days, and it's become to a common thing for the owner to watch as people cross the street and shoot dirty looks as she walks her well-behaved Rottweiler down the street. People who lived in controlled neighbourhoods with a Homeowner's Association are not allowed to have any of the potentially "dangerous" breeds as pets. Insurance companies are starting to refuse policies to people who own these dogs. And in some cities, people have had their dogs confiscated and euthanized due to strict by-laws. Animal shelters are no longer adopting out these breeds, but rather euthanizing them on receipt. WOW, Whatever happened to our dog loving countries?

What makes a dog aggressive and dangerous anyway? Is it their colour? Black and Tan dogs with the few exceptions of toy-sized dogs (Dachshunds, and Miniature Pinschers come immediately to mind) it seems that most black and tan dogs induce fear on sight. Is it their name? Staffordshire Bull Terriers have "Bull Terrier" in their name, they must be evil? What about shape? Any dog with a broad head or cropped ears is game for the breed banning fanatics?

It sure looks as though this is the criteria used to enforce Breed Specific Legislation. It still doesn't answer the question above though, does it? What really makes a dog, any dog, dangerous?

The answer is a scarey one, especially considering that the real criminal rarely gets punished. The owners of the dog are what make a dog dangerous.

Bad dogs are not born, there is no genetic mutation present in certain dog breeds that make them turn against their owner or reach out and bite their latest victim. Bad dogs are created, usually by the people who raise them, less often by unscrupulous breeders who deliberately or unknowingly breed unsound temperaments to another unstable temperament. Every dog is a product of his environment. Every puppy born is born innocent of future charges levied against him by the public. And Denver just murdered how many little puppies??

What will happen when certain parties have their way and the latest "dangerous" breed is eradicated? There will be no more Pit Bulls, what will take their place? When all the Doberman Pinschers are gone, what breed will be next? I'll tell you. America's sweetheart, the Golden Retriever, will be next. As long as the owners are allowed to get a dog and raise it to be a monster, any dog breed can take the next spot on the Banned Breed List. Labrador Retrievers and Standard Poodles have the same amount of teeth as a Chow, and put just as much pressure on as a Poodle. But nobody fears these dogs. Cocker Spaniels and other small breeds have unbelievable bite records, yet people don't panic at the thought of facing one on the street.

What we have now is a band-aid solution. It will work for a very short period of time. What is needed is an implementation of much harsher laws dealing with animal cruelty, neglect, and, yes, maybe we should be looking at licensing dog owners along with their pets. Convicted of animal neglect or cruelty? Then you shall never own another animal again. Why should people be given another pet to ruin?

How can we, as a society, justify euthanizing dogs on sight at shelters and calling for the destruction of dog breeds that make wonderful companions, when the real criminals walk free? What is wrong with this picture??

Check this out...County commissioners, who backed away from an earlier proposal to ban pit bulls, directed administrators Tuesday to work on reducing dog-bite cases by stiffening penalties on humans.

Commissioner Michael Anaya in April had asked the board to consider outlawing pit bulls. He said he was looking for answers after an Edgewood boy was severely injured by a pit bull and a St. Bernard. Anaya cited a Denver law against ownership of pit bulls or dogs that look like pit bulls.

On Tuesday, however, the commissioner said he was more open to putting sharper teeth into dog-ownership rules after hearing suggestions from area officials and from county residents opposed to such a ban.

"The conclusion we came to was that punishment should be on the deed of the animal and not the breed," said Edgewood Animal Control Supervisor Victoria Murphy, who told commissioners the southern Santa Fe County town considered the same idea last year and then passed a law aimed at dog owners instead of dogs. "Breed-specific laws," she said, "are akin to treating the symptoms and not the disease."

When breeds are singled out as dangerous or vicious, responsibility is removed from the owner, which is where it belongs, Breeds and mixes are hard to identify, and often dogs are mislabeled and destroyed based on paranoia and prejudice. It also punishes those that are good canine citizens.

Based on what I have read, you really have no knowledge at all about Dogs. Your all caught up in the same hype and paranoia that alot of other people are ignorant to. Please educate yourself from real professionals on dog behavior and not on all the false hype we have in this country. Killing dogs instead of making laws for dog ownership is not ever going to correct the problem. So if you eradicate all the pitbulls in denver, then you will have to start doing the same with all the other breeds that are notorious for biting. Heck, might as well outlaw all dogs! Its not a solution Sir. Remove the bandaid and fix the real problem. Breed banning is the exact same thing as racial prejustice. And its wrong!

Sincerely,

Cathy Gibson

Just an ordinary citizen who loves all animals.
  
July 26, 2006 at 10:22 AM
posted by: cattees
So the City Council Leader of Denver is a "dog lover"? Yah, that just goes to prove that killing these innocent pups was willful and malicious. It makes what happened EVEN WORSE!!!
  
July 25, 2006 at 8:20 PM
posted by: bullydog
Hell can't burn hot enough. Those people have no souls. Bless those poor dogs.
  
July 25, 2006 at 7:59 PM
posted by: isabellasmom
To those of you supporting us here in Denver with your letters and emails - thank you. Today's news:

Council leader softens his pit bull stance
Rocky Mountain News Tue, 25 Jul 2006 0:33 AM PDT
Denver City Council President Michael Hancock is a dog lover, but he's not a fan of pit bulls.

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/government/article/0,2777,DRMN_23906_4868261,00.html

The City Council is key: If you want your letter to be confidential you have to say so under Colorado law.

District 1
Rick Garcia
2785 Speer Blvd., Suite 246
Denver, Colorado 80211
Phone: (303) 458-4792
Fax: (303) 458-4791
rick.garcia@ci.denver.co.us


District 2
Jeanne Faatz
3100 S. Sheridan Blvd., Unit D
Denver, Colorado 80227
Phone: (303) 763-8562
Fax: (303) 763-8564
jeanne.faatz@ci.denver.co.us

District 3 - Council President
Rosemary E. Rodriguez
69 Knox Ct.
Denver, Colorado 80219
Phone: (303) 922-7755
Fax: (303) 937-4651
rosemary.rodriguez@ci.denver.co.us


District 4
Peggy Lehmann
6740 E. Hampden Avenue
Suite 302
Denver, Colorado 80224
Phone: (303) 504-5781
Fax: (303) 504-5786
peggy.lehmann@ci.denver.co.us

District 5
Marcia Johnson
6740 East Colfax Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80220
Phone: (303) 355-4615
Fax: (303) 355-4127
marcia.johnson@ci.denver.co.us


District 6
Charlie Brown
2324 E. Exposition Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80209
Phone: (303) 871-0601
Fax: (303) 698-4908
charlie.brown@ci.denver.co.us

District 7
Kathleen MacKenzie
1437 Bannock St., Suite 451
Denver, Colorado 80202
Phone: (720) 865-8900
Fax: (720) 865-8903
kathleen.mackenzie@ci.denver.co.us


District 8
Elbra Wedgeworth
3280 Downing St., Unit C
Denver, Colorado 80205
Phone: (303) 298-7641
Fax: (303) 298-9716
elbra.wedgeworth@ci.denver.co.us

District 9
Judy H. Montero
2828 Speer Blvd., Suite 111
Denver, Colorado 80211
Phone: (303) 458-8960
Fax: (720) 865-9540

District 10
Jeanne Robb
1232 E. Colfax Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80218
Phone: (303) 377-1807
Fax: (303) 377-1902
jeanne.robb@ci.denver.co.us


District 11
Michael B. Hancock
4730 Oakland St., Suite 200
Denver, Colorado 80239
Phone: (303) 331-3872
Fax: (303) 331-3874
michael.hancock@ci.denver.co.us

At-Large
Carol Boigon
1437 Bannock St., Suite 451
Denver, Colorado 80202
Phone: (720) 865-8100
Fax: (720) 865-8103
carol.boigon@ci.denver.co.us


At-Large
Doug Linkhart
1437 Bannock St., Suite 451
Denver, Colorado 80202
Phone: (720) 865-8000
Fax: (720) 865-8003
linkhartatlarge@ci.denver.co.us

Council Administration
City Council Administration
1437 Bannock St., Suite 451
Denver, Colorado 80202
Phone: (720) 865-9534
Fax: (720) 865-9540
dencc@ci.denver.co.us
  
July 25, 2006 at 12:23 AM
posted by: claired
Please see the impassioned letter to the mayor written by the manager of The Pit Stop community, at: http://network.bestfriends.org/thepitstop/news/6213.html.
  
July 24, 2006 at 8:07 PM
posted by: bogiedew
What idiots! I walk dogs for a rescue group and today the last dog I walked was a pit. She was the calmest one out of all the dogs in their cages, and the easiest one to walk and the easiest one to put back in the cage. Again, what idiots.
  
July 24, 2006 at 6:09 PM
posted by: MartiL
Doggoneguy - I am interested in what you find out, because often newspapers truncate wire press articles. It would be interesting to know if the AP never mentioned the Montana group, or if the Cleveland paper decided those facts were not worthy of inclusion. Either way, someone left out important facts which is the same (to me) as not telling all the news.
  
July 24, 2006 at 3:12 PM
posted by: doggoneguy
To make matters worse...I don't know how many of you read the Associated Press story on this. It was incompetent reporting at best and failed to mention ONE WORD about the Org. in Montana, etc. I intend to send this page to the Cleveland Plain Dealer Pets Writer immediately as it was there that I saw theis AP "story".
  
July 24, 2006 at 2:41 PM
posted by: djoannm
I just don't understand how or why anyone could be so cruel, especially with a viable alternative that would have cost them nothing. It seems so willfully mean. I agree with the boycott idea and hope the publicity from this will result in some accountability. djoannm
  
July 24, 2006 at 1:37 PM
posted by: cattees
As I said in another post - SHAME ON YOU DENVER!!!

I will also send polite e-mails, but would like to suggest a boycott of Denver and Colorado as a whole. As nice as it may be, there are other more animal-friendly places to visit.

Remember - November is election time! People of Denver and Colorado - think really hard before casting your ballots.
  
July 24, 2006 at 1:16 PM
posted by: marla
definately a disgrace. I will also send polite mail.
I volunteer at a shelter working with dogs. Most of the Pits we get, are without a doubt the sweetest and nicest dogs.
  
July 23, 2006 at 9:23 PM
posted by: cathyg
What a tragedy and what a DISGRACE! I will be sending a polite mail as well.
  
July 23, 2006 at 7:33 PM
posted by: kathypat70005
I believe that we as members of BEST FRIENDS should start a campaign informing the public that pit Bulls are getting a raw deal. They have been given this just because aof a few. my mom was attaked some years back. At the time I was working with a man whose father was murdered. I asked him how did he ever get rid of the anger. He simply told me that he couldn't blame a whole race because of the actions of one man. The same holds true for the Pit bulls
Welcome to the Best Friends Network!
Join the Best Friends Network today!
It’s the best place online to connect with other animal people, have fun, and help save lives in your community and all over the world. Learn More About the Best Friends Network or Join Now.
Member Log In  
Username or Email:  
Password:
 
 
   
Featured Member
Indifferentlife
My name is Kenny, My wife Jessica and myself have a APBT named Athena and...

Join a Community
Mississippi
Mississippi's place on the Best Friends Network
Join a Campaign
First Home Forever Home
A place to learn, commit, and act on behalf of pets and their need for a loving, forever home.

Truth about the Pet Trade

A coalition of kindness to animals caught in the pet trade.