Best Friends Animal Society

Network Home CommunitiesThe Legal Animal News Elderly Katrina victim fights to be reunited with his closest companion.
Welcome to The Legal Animal! The battle to improve animal welfare is moving increasingly into our courts and legislatures. The Legal Animal offers an inside look at this struggle, with up-to-date news on developments in animal law, and in-depth discussions of vital legal issues. We will also give you the tools to make the law work for animals in your area. Please join our community, explore our resources, and learn more about helping animals through law. More>
Prev66 of 126 stories Next
Print
The Legal Animal

Elderly Katrina victim fights to be reunited with his closest companion.

July 1, 2006 : 12:00 AM
Special to The Legal Animal. Malvin Cavalier has filed suit in Pennsylvania for the return of his beloved poodle, Bandit.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Photo: Malvin Cavalier and his grandson pose with Bandit during happier times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the past few years, 86-year-old Malvin Cavalier has lost his wife, his home, and the community where he has spent a lifetime.

Now, his dearest wish is to see his dog, Bandit, again.

“I had Bandit over 10 years. Bandit and I were so close together, and after my wife died in 2003 we got closer together, I didn’t have nobody else,” Cavalier says. “I really just want Bandit back before I leave this earth. I ask almighty God, I pray hard for it every night.”

The last time Cavalier saw Bandit, a miniature poodle mix, was right before Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans. Making a last-minute decision to evacuate to the Superdome, Cavalier left Bandit in their 9th-Ward home with big buckets of dry food and water, and a door ajar in case the dog needed to leave the house.

Weeks later, Bandit was rescued from the New Orleans floodwaters about a mile from Cavalier’s home. Cavalier has now filed a lawsuit to reclaim Bandit from Lisa Fox, a woman in Pennsylvania who has reportedly adopted the dog.

Agonizing decision to leave Bandit behind.

Cavalier struggled with the decision to evacuate without Bandit.

“I felt bad, real bad,” Cavalier says about leaving his dog behind. “They weren’t taking animals at the Superdome, other than that, I would have taken Bandit anywhere, but I wasn’t going to leave him on the street.”

Cavalier says Bandit slept inside with him, and rarely went outside except to go to the bathroom, or help Cavalier do yard work. In fact, he says, he and his dog were almost never apart.

Cavalier and his dog talked frequently, and Cavalier vividly recalls his last conversation with Bandit: “I patted him on the head, and said, ‘Well, Bandit, I can’t take you to the Superdome, because they already broadcast, don’t bring any animals to the Superdome, only human beings. You just hole up here, you’ve got plenty of food – a whole bucket of food that will last a week. I’ll see you in a couple of days when this storm has passed over.’”

But Cavalier didn’t return in a few days. After six terrifying days in the Superdome that he was lucky to survive, he was bused to Dallas, Texas, where he was housed with a group of evacuees in an old jail. Now, he lives in Houston, while he waits for a FEMA trailer to be placed in his yard so he can finally go back home.

Like most New Orleans residents, Cavalier never dreamed that the levees would break, leaving his raised house with five feet of water. He never dreamed that it would be many weeks before authorities would even allow him to visit his neighborhood. And he never dreamed that his dog would end up in Pennsylvania, with a new owner who refuses to return him.

“Bandit is a special dog to me in my life, and why would she try to keep me from enjoying my dog? I wouldn’t do that to her, no way, I’m not that type of man,” he says.


Photo: Bandit is pictured at the Lamar-Dixon temporary shelter in September, 2005.

Bandit's journey.

Since Bandit was rescued, the dog has also had a long and complicated journey.

At first, he was taken to for a few days to the Lamar-Dixon staging area in Gonzales, Louisiana, operated by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). On September 25, Bandit’s picture was posted on Petfinder, along with rabies tag numbers that definitively identified him as Mr. Cavalier’s dog.

According to Cavalier’s lawsuit, paperwork shows that Bandit was taken from Lamar-Dixon by Peter McKosky, a representative of the Chenoa Manor Animal Shelter, and transported to Pennsylvania in late September along with a number of other animals.

In order to take Bandit, McKosky signed agreements with HSUS promising that Bandit would be held at Chenoa Manor until September 30, after which time he could be placed in a foster home. However, under the agreement, the foster home was required to hold the dog until October 15, and return the animal to his owner if claimed before that date. (See tomorrow’s story from The Legal Animal examining the legality of these agreements)

Malvin Cavalier’s son, Marcus, located Bandit’s picture on Petfinder on October 13, and contacted Chenoa Manor requesting his return. He was later told by phone that the dog had never been kept at Chenoa Manor and had been retained by McKosky, the complaint says.

According to the lawsuit, McKosky refused to return Bandit, suggesting that Malvin Cavalier had been irresponsible in “abandoning” the dog, and therefore did not deserve him back. The complaint alleges that McKosky later transferred the dog to Voices for Animals, an animal rights association in Pennsylvania, which subsequently allowed Fox to adopt the dog.

Cavalier aided in lawsuit.

After failed attempts at negotiating for Bandit’s return, Cavalier filed a “complaint in replevin” against Fox, an equitable action seeking the return of Bandit, rather than monetary damages.

Cavalier’s efforts to reclaim Bandit have been aided all along by members of a grassroots group known as the Stealth Volunteers, which specializes in helping to reunite lost Katrina pets with their owners.

Stealth volunteer Sandra Bauer, a resident of Canada, has been trying to aid Cavalier throughout his struggle to reclaim Bandit.

Bauer says that through her work with Stealth she has talked to many owners whose stories have touched her deeply, but that she was particularly moved by the story of Cavalier and Bandit.

“This is a man who had his best friend taken away from him for reasons not of his own choosing, and it seemed like such a simple thing to bring back a little happiness in his life. After everything he’d been through and all he had lost, it seemed like such a simple thing to return his dog – it is incomprehensible that it could be so difficult,” she says.

Cavalier and his representatives have never been able to speak to Fox directly about returning the dog, and have not even been able to locate her to serve her with the lawsuit. In fact, they are still searching for hints to the whereabouts of Fox and Bandit.

Fox is being represented by Pittsburgh attorney Carolyn Flamm, who says she has a policy of not discussing active cases and would not comment on whether her client was willing to return Bandit.

“All I can say is that we were at the point of amicably resolving this case, and the interference of the Stealth Volunteers has been counterproductive to the resolution of this case,” she says, declining to be more specific about what she means by “interference.”

Flamm says she was in the midst of trying to schedule a settlement conference, but that it was cancelled, and she doesn’t know at this point if it will be rescheduled.

Her latest comments follow an article about the case in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette last week, in which Flamm said she thought there was a good chance the case would be settled amicably.

Bauer says that without specifics, she can't comment on the alleged interference by Stealth Volunteers. She did say that as Cavalier’s authorized representatives, she and another Stealth Volunteer, Cindi Nicotera, have gone through lengthy efforts to try to negotiate the return of Bandit.

When there was a concern about how Bandit would travel, Bauer says she arranged for him to either be in the cabin of a plane, or to travel by RV with Bauer and Nicotera. At one point, she says she even had a plane ticket booked, but then the expected reunion fell through again.

A question of respect?

To Bauer, it is a question of fundamental justice and respect.

“This man is a senior citizen and so is the dog, and the two of them deserve to spend their twilight time together after a decade of a shared life,” she says, adding that a family member is prepared to take Bandit if Cavalier gets to a point where he can no longer care for him.

“To me, it is a question of respect for the relationship between these two senior gentlemen, the man and the dog, a question of respect for seniors in general, and a question of respect for someone who had lost everything else, to bring back that piece of his heart,” Bauer says.

For his part, Cavalier just misses the dog who used to always be by his side. And he is sure that Bandit misses him.

He says that on those rare occasions when he would leave Bandit, say for a trip to the supermarket, the dog would be so excited when he returned that he would tear around the house and yard in celebration.

“I guarantee if Bandit would see me right now, he’d probably do the same thing,” Cavalier says.

If you would like to contribute to the legal fund to reunite Mr. Cavalier and Bandit, you may do so by emailing questions, or sending money through Paypal, to this address: banditlegal@yahoo.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next: An overview of the legal cases brought by Katrina victims for the return of their pets.

Please visit the Forums section of this website to comment on the question: Should Katrina victims have to sue for the return of their animals?


Sign in to post a comment
Comments
  
August 30, 2006 at 12:30 AM
posted by: sandycats99
Yes, it's true, Bandit will soon be going home to Malvin. Thank you to everyone for your support during this difficult time.
Additional information is available at:

http://www.banditandmalvin.blogspot.com

We'll also post some reunion pictures when they become available.
  
August 27, 2006 at 10:00 PM
posted by: isabellasmom
HAVE YOU HEARD!!! Yes, I'm shouting!!! Bandit is going home!!!!

Evidently, the adoptive parents weren't told the entire truth and read about what was happening. They have already surrendered Bandit and he will be headed home soon!

More details here:
http://www.ericsdogblog.com/
  
July 6, 2006 at 3:44 PM
posted by: twofancy4u
SHARE CUSTODY?~? Give Mr Cavalier back HIS beloved dog! He was forced to leave Bandit behind because the authorities would NOT let pets at the Superdome. Even if he had been rescued at home, Mr Cavalier would have been forced to leave Bandit behind. How can Mr Cavalier be called "irresponsible"?? He left enough food and water and he planned to return. He did not just turn Bandit loose and walk away. I am sure it was a VERY hard decision to leave his only companion behind. There were thousands of pets that owners were "forced" to leave behind, so I guess if Mr Cavalier is just one of thousands that "abandoned" his pet. Come on?~? Yes, we do have some irresponsible pet owners In Louisiana, just as you do where you live (maybe, you should check with your local animal shelter). I have been working to reunite owners with their pets since the Hurricane's and not one of them has stated "I voluntarily abandoned my pet." Do you think the little boy who tried to board the bus with his beloved puppy (only to have it taken away by a law enforcement official) wanted to "abandon" his pet?? In case you did not see the story, the little boy cried and screamed to the point that he threw up and had to be pushed onto the bus by others. Was he irresponsible?? How about the 71 year old man that I personally reunited his 14 year old dog after she spent 3 weeks in the elements?? Hold on! Let me tell you his story. This gentleman spent 3 days in his attic. After all, he had stayed thru the worst Hurricanes and made it. What everyone seems to forget is, that the Hurricane had past and sure there was damage, that was to expected. It was the breakage in the leeves that caused the problem. Imagine waking up to find you survived the storm but now the water is rising and rising fast. It did not matter if you had one car or a whole car lot, it was not going to do you one bit of good. By this time, it was too late to drive out of town. So, Mr Smith (not his real name) climbed into the attic with his beloved dog named "Maggie". She was all he had left after his wife died. After staying in the attic for 3 days, he managed to make it across the street to the roof top where another man was staying with his dog and he also had a neighbor's dog. So, that makes 2 men and 3 dogs. A boat came by (to rescue ONLY people not people and their pets) and they talked Mr Smith into getting in the boat. However, before he did so, he asked if he could come back with help to rescue the man and the 3 dogs. The rescue personnel assured him that they would come back and get the others. However, once in the boat, Mr Smith was told that they were NOT going to go back and rescue the dogs. At this point, he asked to get out of the boat and was
NOT allowed to do so. He never saw the man or his beloved "Maggie" after that. He relocated to Monroe to be with
his family. It was not until I saw an email from his niece that I was able to locate "Maggie". During this time, Mr Smith did nothing but sit in a chair and cry daily over Maggie. He refused to return home to NO. He had to seek professional help. After 5 trips to Lamar Dixon, we found "Maggie" in the intensive care unit. The ordeal had taken it's toll not only on Mr Smith but "Maggie" as well. You see, it seems the gentleman that had Maggie and the 2 other dogs took them as far as he could and then was not allowed to take them with him. He was "forced" to "abandon" them. We drove "Maggie" home to Monroe and Mr Smith. He did not know Maggie had been found until we knocked on the door. There was not a dry eye anywhere to be found. The guilt that Mr Smith felt had begun to destroy his life. I recently learned that Maggie had past away. However, Mr Smith's family assures me that having Maggie back for the short period of time, helped Mr Smith over come the guilt and pain that had taken over his life. So would Mr Smith be called IRRESPONSIBLE?? How about the pet owners who took their pets to a certain high school and were assured that their pets would be rescued?? What to know what happened?? Their pets were brutually killed! Would these pet owners be called IRRESPONSIBLE?? How about the 12 year girl who went with her father in a boat and rescued others' pet by placing them on roof tops so they would not drown while
Her own dog was left high and dry with plenty of food and water. When they came back for her a couple of days later, she had been rescued. To this day, this girl has not had her dog returned. Her dog would have jumped out of the boat and they could not take her where they were staying. Do we call her IRRESPONSIBLE?? What about the lady who had her young daughter and 3 elderly neighbors to help wade thru neck-high water. Was she supposed to let the neighbors drown?? Do we call her IRRESPONSIBLE?? I live in Louisiana, close to the NO area and I can't begin to imagine what these people went thru. How can any of us judge, if we did not experience this for ourselves?? Not only did these people loose their homes, businesses, loved ones,etc.--I guess we will just add their beloved pets to the list. Hope it NEVER, EVER happens to you.
It also amazes me that by adding the word "Katrina" to an animal in a shelter NOW makes it adoptable!!! Where were you when millions of animals were PTS?? Maybe, if we add the label "Katrina" to all the shelter pets, there would be no need for shelters. Now, this would be IRRESPONSIBLE!! Don't you agree? Do TWO animals a favor--return the pets to the RIGHTFUL OWNERS and ADOPT another from your local shelter.
  
July 6, 2006 at 2:12 PM
posted by: sandycats99
That doesn't make sense, the notion of "shared custody." Shared custody presupposes that both parties had a pre-existing claim on the animal as do the parents of a child. This is different. If a firefighter rescues a baby from a burning building while the baby's parents are lying in the hospital, the firefighter has no right to keep that baby or expect shared custody because s/he rescued it.
  
July 4, 2006 at 2:46 PM
posted by: pattycatty
You'd think maybe these people could work out a shared custody arrangement of some kind. After all, divorcing parents put less thought and effort into dividing up the kids than this.
Welcome to the Best Friends Network!
Join the Best Friends Network today!
It’s the best place online to connect with other animal people, have fun, and help save lives in your community and all over the world. Learn More About the Best Friends Network or Join Now.
Member Log In  
Username or Email:  
Password:
 
 
   
Featured Member
welk9483
A greeting tail hello. I'm mostly interested in TNR, cat rescue, and...

Join a Community
Los Angeles Network
Connecting Animal-Lovers, Rescue Communties, and ALL who would like to learn something new, get involved or "somehow" help homeless animals in the Los Angeles Community.
Join a Campaign
Nye County Cat Rescue
Best Friends called in to assist more than 800 cats in distress in Pahrump, Nevada.

Truth about the Pet Trade

A coalition of kindness to animals caught in the pet trade.