Posted
June 17, 2009, 9:37AM
by
kwalton
I sent out e-mails and got this response:
Thanks for your e-mail on this quality of life and safety issue Elgin citizens are struggling with.
We are working hard to do what is right for the citizens of Elgin. I have personally promised our citizens that I will not be swayed by anyone who does not live or work in Elgin on this topic. It's too important of an issue.
Sincerely,
Councilman John Prigge
PLEASE e-mail this man and POLITLEY inform him that his decision will have an immediate ripple affect that will not ONLY affect the citizens of Elgin, but animal welfare and rescue groups throughout IL as well as many other states!
prigge_j@cityofelgin.org
THANK YOU!
Posted
June 14, 2009, 4:30PM
by
patvanil
It is not the dogs who should be banned, it is the owners of these animals. Banning a specific breed will do nothing to stop gang, drug, and dog fighting activity. They will find another way to break the law.
Whatever laws are currently on the books should be enforced. You are not solving the problems, you are moving the problems to other towns and neighborhoods. It is like spitting in the wind, dog fighting is endemic in the U.S. Education and mandatory spay/neuter laws might be a start. However, again you cannot stop stupid.
Posted
June 15, 2009, 1:52PM
by
nicol
BSL does not work... look at Denver... it has been a abysmal failure. There are no bad dogs, just bad people. Dogs are a reflection of their owners and the way they have been treated and trained, nothing more, nothing less. That is why we need tough laws that go after all the people who abuse, mistreat, torture, fight, and neglect dogs. Until you target the right end of the leash, the problem will never go away. Abusive and reckless people must be arrested, prosecuted, serve jail time and must be banned from having animals for the rest of their lives. If you take their dog away or ban a breed, they simply move onto another. I lived in the UK where they have BSL, and guess what, the deranged sick people who would abuse and mistreat pit bulls are doing it to other breeds. The current breeds of choice are akitas and chocolate labs. IT IS THE PEOPLE THAT ARE THE PROBLEM, not the dogs!!! BAN THE BAD PEOPLE.
Posted
June 17, 2009, 10:46PM
by
Mimi
I hope Councilman Prigge doesn't mean that his determination not to be "swayed" is also a determination not to be informed. I appreciate his interest in not bowing to external pressures, but a good idea is a good idea wherever it comes from, and relevant data is still relevant, regardless of the address of the person presenting it. He is right: it's too important of an issue.
Elgin city council is considering a ban on "Pit Bulls" after a Chihuahua was allegedly attacked by two dogs and later euthanized due to her injuries.
However, as far as I know, details of the situation were never clarified. Did the Chihuahua run onto the dogs' property? Or were the pit bulls loose and able to attack her outside on the sidewalk? In either scenario, the responsibility lies with the owner of the respective dog(s).
I am shocked and ashamed that my own town's council is actually considering a breed-specific ban on pit bulls, when there are several residents here with pit bull type dogs that we have rescued from local shelters. We have all had our dogs playing together in the dog park, along with a large variety of other breeds as well as humans of all ages.
I sincerely hope that Councilman Prigge and the rest of the members will, as he states, really think about this issue before making rash and ineffective decisions.
Michelle C.
Elgin, IL
P.S.
Here is the link to a local blog with an ongoing discussion about this issue.
http://elginite.org/blog/2009/07/01/elgin-considers-pit-bull-measures
KWalton, I mentioned the response you received in a comment I just posted there to illustrate that the council is NOT carefully thinking this out as they claim to be. If they were, they would realize it isn't an issue that only affects current residents.